The News (Source: CNN)
Three US senators are questioning Twitter, Google parent Alphabet, and Facebook parent Meta about whether layoffs may have made it more difficult for the companies to thwart the spread of false information prior to the 2024 elections.
The lawmakers warned the businesses in a letter dated Tuesday that reported employee reductions to content moderation and other teams would make it more difficult for the companies to uphold their obligations to election integrity.
Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat from Minnesota, Peter Welch, a Democrat from Vermont, and Dick Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois, stated in the letter, "This is particularly troubling given the emerging use of artificial intelligence to mislead voters," according to a copy of the letter acquired by CNN.
Reason behind the worry: CNN Reports
Elon Musk has reduced employees by more than 80% since purchasing Twitter in October 2022, often dissolving whole teams.
Earlier this year, Alphabet announced intentions to let off some 12,000 employees across several product lines and geographic areas. In addition, Meta earlier announced it would cut 21,000 jobs through two rounds of layoffs, affecting teams working on policy, user experience, and well-being, among other things.
"We continue to invest in teams and technologies to protect our community, including our efforts to prepare for elections around the world," Andy Stone, a spokesperson for Meta, said in a statement to CNN regarding the letter. "We remain focused on advancing our industry-leading integrity efforts."
An inquiry for comments was not immediately answered by Twitter or Alphabet.
Response to CNN from the Tech CEOs
In response to economic headwinds, the cutbacks at those companies have coincided with a wider industry downturn. Competitors like Microsoft and Amazon have reduced their workforces as well, while several other companies have declared recruiting freezes.
But because of their involvement in helping the US electoral process, social media corporations are now being scrutinized further.
In a letter sent on Tuesday, CEOs of Twitter, Alphabet, and Meta were questioned about their preparations for the 2024 elections and for any potential misinformation that may surround the campaigns. Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet, and CEO of Meta were also questioned.
The senators used recent changes at Alphabet-owned YouTube to show how posting of false allegations that the 2020 presidential election was rigged is now permitted, as well as what they called content moderation "challenges" at Twitter following the layoffs, as examples of their concerns.
The letter, which requests comments by July 10, also enquired as to whether the platforms would be specifically geared up for the rise of AI-generated deepfakes in politics and whether the businesses might hire more content moderation staff or contractors before the election.
Candidates like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis appear to have already utilized phony, AI-generated visuals to attack their rivals, raising concerns about the dangers that AI may pose to democracy.
Most Possible Outcomes of Layoffs on 2024 Elections
The layoffs of content moderation teams at tech companies could potentially have an impact on the 2024 US elections. Content moderation teams are responsible for enforcing community guidelines, removing inappropriate or harmful content, and ensuring that platforms maintain a certain level of quality and safety.
Here are a few ways in which content moderation team layoffs could affect the elections:
Spread of misinformation and disinformation
Content moderation teams play a crucial role in identifying and removing false or misleading information from online platforms. Layoffs could lead to a reduction in the number of moderators available to monitor and address such content. This could potentially allow misinformation and disinformation to spread more widely, potentially influencing public opinion and voter decisions.
Impact on political advertising
Content moderation teams also play a role in reviewing and approving political advertisements on platforms. Layoffs could result in delays or backlogs in the approval process, impacting the ability of campaigns to run their ads effectively and reach their target audience in a timely manner.
Challenges in handling harmful or abusive content
Content moderation teams are responsible for identifying and removing harmful or abusive content, including hate speech and harassment. Layoffs could strain the capacity of the remaining moderation teams, potentially leading to delays in addressing such content. This could create an environment that is less conducive to healthy political discourse and could impact candidates' ability to engage with voters.
Changes in moderation policies and practices
Layoffs may prompt tech companies to reconsider their moderation policies and practices. This could result in changes to algorithms, automated systems, or outsourcing moderation tasks to third-party contractors. These changes may introduce new challenges, potential biases, or unintended consequences that could impact the visibility and reach of political content.
Trust and perception of platforms
Layoffs within content moderation teams could impact the perception and trustworthiness of tech platforms. If the public perceives that platforms are not adequately addressing harmful or misleading content due to a reduced moderation workforce, it could erode confidence in these platforms as reliable sources of information and impact users' engagement with political content.
It's important to note that the actual impact of content moderation team layoffs on the 2024 US elections would depend on the specific circumstances, how tech companies respond to these changes, and the adaptability of political campaigns, regulators, and users in navigating any resulting challenges.
Comments